Arguments for Trade Protection Lecture 8
|
| |
Externalities
|
1. Distortions - causes a gap between private and social benefits (or costs)
- Causes
- Government policies such as taxes, subsidies, price controls, quotas, etc.
- Market failure
- Positive or negative externalities
- Monopoly - a monopolist's reduces supply to cause the market price to rise, and he or she earns long-run economic profits
2. Externalities – failure to include all costs and/or benefits
- Negative externality - an individual's or firm's action harms others without their consent
- Property rights are not defined well
- Not all costs are registered, therefore supply function understates the true cost of production
- Example: A polluting firm
- A firm supplies Q* which sell for P* and freely pollutes
- Pollution is a social cost to society, Social Marginal Costs (SMC)
- Government can force the firm to include pollution costs, causing the supply function to shift left
- Gov. imposes taxes, regulations, pollution permits, etc.
- Taxes are efficient in this case
- Equilibrium price increases while quantity supplied decreases
- This is efficient because firm pays all costs including pollution
- Firms still pollute, but less
- Note – Countries impose a tariff against countries that have lax environmental laws
- Example - leakages - U.S. relocate manufacturing to China, because China has little environmental regulations
| A Polluting Firm Pollutes the Environment |
|
- Positive externality (or spillover effects) - an individual's actions generate benefits for nonparticipating parties
- Demand functions understates the true value of output
- Called Social Marginal Benefits (SMB)
- From the viewpoint of efficiency, too few units may be produced
- Example: Inoculations - people getting inoculated help prevent the spread of diseases
- People who are not inoculated also benefit
- Government can subsidize inoculations, bringing the market price down
- Gov. imposes trade barriers that generate Social Marginal Benefits (SMB)
- Compare the gains from SMB to the deadweight loss
- Examples of expanding domestic industry
- Creates knowhow and management specialization
- High cost spur technological innovation
- Protect national defense
- Help a disadvantaged group
- Create national pride
- Reduce training costs for displaced workers
- Note – author says a production subsidy is more effective than a tariff
- Tariffs generate revenue
- For gov. to pay a subsidy, another market has to be taxed
|
Infant Industry Argument
|
- American Alexander Hamilton (1755-1804)
- U.S. came into existence in 1791
- Hamilton stated we need to protect U.S. industries
- U.S. industries were young and needed to thrive and grow
- Imposed tariffs on imports
- Gives U.S. gov. revenue
- German Friedrich List (1789-1846) – exiled from Germany for his views
- State action was needed to promote education, technology, and industry
- Promotes heavy industry
- Industries require more mental abilities than in agricultural
- Import substitution - a country helps develop a domestic industry that substitutes for imported products
- Mercantilistic policy – restrict imports and keep exports the same
- Worked for the U.S.
- Failure for Brazil, Mexico, Turkey, and other Latin American countries
- Benefits
- Low risk to establish business, because market is already there
- Could encourage foreigners to invest in country to avoid trade barriers
- Problems
- Government has problems picking winners and losers
- Fosters monopolies; restricts competition
- A smaller market means firms cannot gain economies of scale in production
- Difficult to remove protection; protected industry will resist
- Gov. may own or control industry; could foster corruption
- No focus on exports
- Exports are a source foreign revenue
- Many governments borrowed to finance current spending
- Many governments could not control their spending
- Mexico and Latin American countries had a crisis in late 1980s and early 1990s
- Economics
- Similar to the economics of a tariff
- Over time, a country’s supply function would increase and shift right, if the theory is valid
|
Dying Industry Argument
|
- Free trade causes one or more industries to go in decline
- The country does not have a comparative advantage in these industries
- Regional effects – industries tend to be located in specific regions
- Regions go into economic decline
- Labor, capital, and land have trouble moving to new industries
- People complain loudly to politicians in their region
- Politicians help pass tariffs to protect region and garner votes
- Product Life Cycle - country produces a high-tech good and then loses its comparative advantage
- Country starts producing a high-tech product
- Country exports this product
- A foreign country begins producing product
- Country loses its comparative advantage
- Foreign country begins exporting product
- The United States lost its electronics, radios, computers, cars, TV sets, etc.
|
Government Revenue
|
- Government Revenue
- Government needs the revenue from tariffs and export taxes
- Country may be low income with high tax evasion
- Government (i.e. customs) can easily monitor border crossings and ports, and collects tax revenue
- Note – export taxes hinder exports, because taxes cause a higher price
- Government needs the money
- National Defense and National Security
- An ancient argument
- Mercantilistic policy
- Government fosters specific industries that are critical to the country
- Types
- Weapons – many countries manufacture their own guns and weapons
- Stockpile critical resources, like metals and petroleum
- Protect agricultural industries for food security
|
Politics
|
1. Tariff escalation – tariffs become greater with products that have more manufacturing
- Example
- Raw materials tend to have no or little tariffs
- Intermediate goods tend to have higher tariffs
- Finished products like clothes, cars, etc. have the highest tariff
- Government is protecting a manufacturing industry
- Company can circumvent a tariff by producing product within country using imported parts; reduces impact of a tariff
- Strengthens the North-South Dilemma
- Countries
- Asian tigers and Japan have little natural resources; import raw materials for their factories
- China has natural resources; growing so fast that it also imports massive amounts of resources
2. Politics - trade protection are tied to politics
- Large companies may produce the finished products
- Campaign contributions
- Lobby political leaders
- Companies can bribe politicians for trade protection
- Russia and other corrupt countries
- Bureaucrats impose trade barriers for products (and prevent entry of foreign firms into country)
- Create monopolies
- Monopolists can pay high bribes to bureaucrats
- Manufacturing adds significant value to products
- Example – taking silicon and creating computer chips
- The high value of chips can support high wages
- The squeaky wheel gets the grease
- People harmed by free trade complain to politicians
- Book - democratic governments are more likely to pass trade protection
- Not true – dictatorships can move faster
- The dictator wants a new law; thus, the law quickly comes into existence
- Many dictators do not use free markets
- Dictators expand their military and increase their power base
- Democracies – laws can be challenged by courts, etc.
|