Trade Blocs and Trade Sanctions Lecture 10
|
|
Trade Blocs
|
- Trade Bloc – promote internal free trade with members while retaining trade barriers with nonmember nations
- Trade discrimination
- Violates GATT and WTO principles of nondiscrimination
- Types
- Free-trade area – a group of countries remove trade barriers among themselves but keep their separate barriers for outsiders
- Example: North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
- Customs Union – a group of countries remove trade barriers among themselves and have a common external barriers to outsiders
- Example: Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan
- Example: The Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR) – Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay
- Common market – a customs union that allows full freedom of factors, like capital, labor, products, and services
- Example: European Union (EU)
- Economic Union – member countries unify all economic policies, like monetary, fiscal, and welfare policies
- Economics – trade bloc could increase the world’s welfare, because it encourages more trade
- China’s price is P China
- If the United States imposes a tariff on Chinese products, then the price rises to P tariff
- The price of a Mexican good is P Mexico
- Note – supply functions are perfectly elastic; thus no producers' surplus
The Economics of a Trade Bloc |
|
-
- United States has with free trade with China
- Consumers' surplus = a + b + c + d + e + f
- Total welfare = a + b + c + d + e + f
- United States imposes a tariff on Chinese products
- Consumers' surplus = a
- Gov. revenue = b + d
- Total welfare = a + b + d
- Deadweight loss = c + e + f
- United States forms a free trade area with Mexico
- Consumers' surplus = a + b + c
- Gov. revenue = 0
- Gain = a + b + c - (a + b + d) = c – d
- The United States gains c but the U.S. gov. loses revenue d
- A country gains if area c exceeds area d
- If trading bloc partner has production costs similar to nonmember
- The demand is more elastic; it shrinks d and expands c
- Note – welfare loss is still d + e + f
- Trade diversion – trade shifts from a low-cost producer to a higher cost trade partner
- Example - Great Britain joined the EU
- Food prices increased 25% because trade was diverted from Australia, Canada, and New Zealand to the EU
- England pays taxes to EU that subsidizes the EU ag. industry heavily
- Benefits of Trade Blocs
- Unifying countries increases the number of customers
- Fosters competition and reduces prices
- Monopolies in individually countries compete with monopolies from member countries
- Competition forces firms to minimize costs and implement new technologies
- Enhance production specialization and efficiency
- Firms may have increasing scales to production
- The larger a company is, the per unit cost become lower
- Basis for a natural monopoly
- Could increase business investment; foreigners invest within trade bloc to avoid trade barriers
|
Examples of Trade Blocs
|
1. European Union (EU) - created a common market; capital, goods, labor, and services are free to move anywhere within the EU
- EU has 27 members as of 2012
- Replicate the U.S. by forming a large market with one currency
- Spur economic growth
- Difficult for outsiders to penetrate EU markets
- Eurozone is 17 countries use the common currency – euro
- Created the institutions
- European Parliament
- European Court of Justice
- European Central Bank
- Frankfurt, Germany
- Keep euro stable with low inflation rate
- Dominates international trade
- Euro has appreciated against the U.S. dollar until the European Debt Crisis
- Removed product regulations for countries
- Greek ice cream
- German beer purity and labeling laws
- Belgian chocolate
- Remove customs among EU countries, etc.
- EU Membership requires
- Democracy
- Human rights
- Functioning market economy
- Turkey and Croatia want to join even in 2012
- Benefits of euro
- Cheaper transaction costs; no currency conversion
- Reduces exchange rate uncertainty
- Promotes competition; regions can specialize
- Problems of euro
- Countries give up control over monetary policy
- Prices are higher relative to wages under the euro
- A central bank cannot devalue currency to stimulate economic growth
2. NAFTA – trade bloc for U.S., Canada, and Mexico
- Started in 1994
- Economists estimated Mexico gained the most and Canada was second
- Before 1980s, Mexico had a closed economy like Soviet Union
- Had a financial crisis in 1994 and 1995
- Last four presidents have been opening Mexico up to free markets and international trade
- NAFTA forces Mexico to be more market oriented
- Mexico had to relax foreign investment laws; attract U.S. investment
- Mexico gained from the growth in the citrus, sugar, and some agricultural industries
- Mexico attracted low-skill manufacturing like textiles, apparel, and auto parts
- Mexico opened free trade with other countries like Cuba
- Can slip products through Mexico and into the U.S. circumventing the U.S. trade barriers
- Preempt – Japan
- Japanese were heavily investing in Mexico
- NAFTA reduce Japan’s influence
- Talk to expand NAFTA to South American countries
|
Trade Sanctions
|
Trade Sanctions – impose punishment on a country
- Boycotts, restrictions, or embargoes
- Force a country to do something
- Both sides of a trade sanction are harmed
- Reduces exports and imports for both countries
- Trade sanctions do not work
- Third party nations become the middlemen, circumventing the trade embargo
- Food embargoes – starve the people; leaders never go hungry
- If country is democratic, the people can change leadership
- If country has a dictator, it is hard to remove him
- Usually large countries pick on the smaller countries
- Economic impact is smaller on large country
- Example
- U.S. imposed sanctions on Cuba in 1950s
- President Fidel Castro's communist regime
- Outlawed trade between U.S. businesses and Communist bloc countries
- Cuba and Mexico have free trade
- Mexico and U.S. have free trade via NAFTA
- Americans eat Cuban sugar
|