1. Definitions
-
Disposable Income (DI)
- income remaining after taxes are deducted
- Households spend a portion of income on consumption (C) and save (S) a portion
-
Consumption schedule
- the amount households in a country spend on goods and services
-
Savings schedule
- the amount household in a country save
- Important for savers to deposit savings into banks
- Banks lend to businesses and households
- Businesses borrow to invest in capital, such as buildings, machines, and equipment
- Households borrow for house mortgages, car loans, appliances, etc.
- A country requires a well developed banking system
- If the public does not trust the banks, then the people do not deposit their savings into banks and this money is removed from the economy
- Gov. calls this hoarding
- Causes poor economic growth
- Note - a country with high savings and well developed banking system may experience real estate bubbles
- The bank loans cause rapid rises in real estate prices
- Consumption versus GDP is shown below
2. Economists define two ratios
-
Average Propensity to Consume APC)
- on average, the proportion a society spends from its disposable income
-
Average Propensity to Save (APS)
- on average, the proportion a society saves from its disposable income
- Example: A society's total disposable income is $40,000 per year and saves $10,000 of it.
- What are its APC and APS?
- He consumes $30,000, because DI - S = $40,000 - $10,000 = $30,000
We can derive another relationship. We know disposable income is either spent on consumption or saved, thus
Net Savings Rates for Several Countries |
Country |
2006 (%)
|
2012 (%)
|
Australia |
2.4 |
9.6 |
Canada |
3.5 |
3.3 |
France (gross) |
14.8 |
16.1 |
Germany |
10.8 |
11.0 |
Japan |
1.1 |
1.9 |
United Kingdom (gross) |
3.1 |
6.6 |
United States |
2.6 |
4.3 |
South Korea |
5.2 |
2.9 |
Source: Pasquali, Valentina and Tina Aridas. June 2012. Household Savings Rates. Available from http://www.gfmag.com/tools/global-database/economic-data/12065-household-saving-rates.html#axzz2kt1e9z00
- Marginal is important!
- For example, a low-income country has a GDP per capita of $5,000 per year
- People have low savings rate
- People may have high consumption rate as they consume income on food
- Banking system may not develop well with low savings rate
- For example, a high-income country like Qatar has a GDP per capita of $80,000 per year
- People have high savings rates
- Qatar can invest its money in developed countries like Europe and United States
- Savings and consumption can be different for different levels of disposable income
- In math, delta, D, means change
-
Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC)
- the amount a society increases its consumption if its aggregate disposable income increases by $1
-
Marginal Propensity to Save (MPS)
- the amount a society increases its savings if its aggregate disposable income increases by $1
Likewise, MPS + MPC = 1, because if disposable income increases, a society either spends it or saves it.
- MPC and MPS are slopes of a line, when C = f(DI) and S = g(DI)
- As disposable income increases, both the consumption and savings increase.
- The consumption and savings functions both have positive slopes
What determines consumption and savings? These factors shift the consumption and savings functions
- Wealth - households' level of wealth determines consumption and savings
- wealth - amount of assets held by a household
- physical - houses, cars, real estate, and land
- financial - cash, stocks, bonds, pensions, etc.
- As households become wealthier, their consumption rises
- Example - 2008 Financial Crisis
- Stock prices and home values are dropping, people become less wealthy and reduce their consumption
- Both consumption and savings functions decrease and shift downward.
- Expectations - households expectations of the future determine consumption and savings levels
- Example 1 - A person graduated from college and found a high-paying job, he boosts both his consumption and savings
- Example 2 - 2008 Financial Crisis, people expect the economy to enter a recession; increasing layoffs, foreclosures, and unemployment rates
- With an uncertain financial future, households will save more
- Consumption function falles while savings function rises
- Real Interest Rates - impact household consumption and savings
- If a household spends income on consumption, it has an opportunity cost. The household could invest that money and earn interest
- If real interest rates are low, households have low opportunity costs and increase their consumption
- Consumption function increases while savings function falls
- If real interest rates are high, households have a high opportunity costs; thus they increase their savings and reduce consumption
- Consumption function could decrease and savings function could increase
- Household Debt - households can borrow from future income
- Households can consume more today by borrowing and increasing their debt
- Households may save more in the future to pay off this debt
- If households are burdened with too much debt, then they could reduce their consumptions and savings levels
- Consumption and savings functions both fall.
- Taxes
- If government increases taxes, disposable income decreases
- Households must reduce their consumption and/or savings
- Consumption and savings functions could both decrease.
|
-
Financial intermediaries
- institutions that link savers to investors
- banks - accepts deposits from savers and lends
- savers earn interest
- bank grants loans to businesses
- businesses pay interest to the bank
- bank earns profits by earning more interest than what it pays to savers
- banks - extremely important for an economy
- Businesses invest in structures, machines, and equipment
- Greater productivity
- Higher production level
- The reason - more profits
- Businesses only invest if they expect greater profits
- Marginal analysis - changing the amount of capital
-
Expected rate of return
- a profit as a percentage given the investment has future cash flows and costs
- More complicated - investment creates future cash flows
- Expected - profit is a future event; it may occur or not occur
- Business invests in project in two ways
- Issues more stock or bonds- investors buy stock or bonds allowing the corporation to raise more money
- Opportunity cost - investors expect a higher return from the stock or bonds as opposed to earning interest at a bank
- Bank loans - interest is the cost of borrowing
- Analysis removes impact of inflation - every thing is converted to real terms
- Businesses will invest if real expected return > real interest rate
- Businesses will not invest if real interest rate > real expected rate of return
- Example
- Will a business invest if businesses expects a real rate of return of 10%, the nominal interest rate is 20% and inflation is 15%?
- real interest rate is, r = 20% - 15% = 5%
- Yes, the rate of return is greater, so business will invest
-
Investment Demand Function
- businesses demand investment funding
- Real interest rate is the price
- As real interest rate rises, businesses lower their quantity demanded for investment funds
- A higher interest rate implies the future project has a higher expected return
- Business may have fewer capital investments with high expected returns
- Relationship between real interest rate and investment is below
- Investment Demand Function can shift
- Future project costs
- All factors cause Investment Demand to decrease
- New capital become more expensive over time
- Higher costs to operate capital
- Higher taxes
- Higher energy costs
- Higher labor costs
- Higher maintenance
- Technological advances
- Businesses increase their investment demand function
- Increases productivity
- Could increase quality or quantity given the same resource inputs
- Increases efficiency such as using less electricity
- Company's capital level
- If a company is using 75% of its capital, then it may reduce its investment demand
- Company has plenty of excess capital and does not need to invest in more
- During recessions, businesses reduce their production levels
- Have excess capital
- Businesses reduce their investments
- Expectations
- Businesses increase their investment demands
- Optimistic about the future
- Economy is growing
- Country changed its legal structure, becoming more capitalistic
- Businesses decrease their investment demands
- Pessimistic about the future
- Recession, wars, political instability
Instability of the Investment Function -investment function is always changing
- Durability - some capital goods can have a long life
- Petroleum industry - pipes, tanks, and other equipment can last for decades
- Car manufacturing - factories can have machines several decades old
- During recession - businesses may fix older machines and equipment instead of buying new stuff
- Innovation - innovation occurs irregular
- As economy adopts technology on a wide scale - causes a surge in investment
- Railroads
- Electricity
- Automobiles
- Computers
- Advance communications
- Profits - a businesses' expectations of future profits
- An industry expects future profitability - firms may increase current investment
- Example - economy switched to flatscreen TVs, so TV manufacturers are investing in capital that make them
- An industry expects future losses - firms decrease current investment
- Example - steel industry, U.S. automobile industry, tube T.V. industry, etc. expect future losses, these firms should use up their capital stock
- Government intervention
- Government can change regulatory structure, alter tax structure, or subsidize investment
- Example: U.S. government wants biofuels to penetrate transportation fuels market
- Biodiesel substitutes for diesel, U.S. government offers $1 per gallon subsidy for biodiesel from agricultural sources
- Ethanol substitutes for gasoline, U.S. government offers a $0.51 per gallon subsidy
- Encouraged the building of biofuels industry
- State and local government offers tax breaks and/or partnerships
- Attract new companies to their area and company invests in new capital
- People's expectations of government intervention
- Example: The U.S. government's $700 billion bailout package for the financial system in 2008
- Pros
- May slow down the collapse of large financial institutions
- Provide national and international confidence in the U.S. financial markets
- Financial sector is important sector of economy
- Links savers to borrowers
- Many households have pension plans, savings, etc. that are linked to the financial market's performance
- Cons
- Markets for motgages may be already saturated
- Cannot force borrowers to take out new loans
- Rewards the financial industry for bad decision making
- Granting mortgages to anyone who wanted one
- Allows investors who did not get out in time to "cash" out their investments
- Businesses and banks are hoarding the cash and not granting loans
- Could cause inflation, as "money" is injected into the financial system
- Could cause further weakening of the U.S. dollar
- U.S. government gains ownership in financial industry
- Bureaucrats make poor decisions
- If U.S. economy enters a long recession like Japan, then U.S. government accumulates losses from holding financial assets
- Below is growth in GDP and investments
|
Did you notice that investment has larger swings than GDP? |
|
Multiplier Effect
- the impact on the economy (or GDP) when spending or investment changes in the economy
- Example - HP is building a new manufacturing plant in Conway, AR.
- Direct Impact - HP invested $28 million building the facility and hiring employees
- New employees and construction companies earned money
- 1200 HP workers and $50 million payroll
- Does not include construction workers, but they earn money too!
- With more income, the employees and construction workers spend more
- New houses
- New cars
- Clothing, restaurants, cinemas, etc.
- These businesses have more customers and earn more profits and income
- These businesses hire more workers
- Work workers longer
- These employees have higher income and increase their spending and savings
- The process continues indefinitely
- The $28 million investment in Conway, AR could result in more than $28 million in incomes
- Other benefits
- White collar employment - encourage more people to gain computer skills
- More income increases government's tax revenue
- Government can increase its spending and provide more services to the community
- The Multiplier Effect can work in reverse
- A large firm or plant shuts down
- Workers are laid off
- They have less income and decrease their spending and savings
- Other businesses experience a slow down
- They reduce their workforce
- The process continues indefinitely
- Note - Less income means government collects less tax revenue
- Usually government increases or expands taxes
- Example
- Flint, MI - GM shut down manufacturing
- Gary, IN - U.S. steel industry severely contracted with competition from Japan during 1980s
- Jobs left, then the workers, the poor were left behind, crime and drugs became rampant
- Investment or changes in government spending, taxes, net exports, and consumption drive the multiplier
- Example: Investment increases by $100
- Round 1: Income increases by $100 Savings is $10 and consumption is $90
- Round 2: Income increases by $90 Savings is $9 and consumption is $81
- Round 3: Income increases by $81 Savings is $8.10 and consumption is $72.90
- Infinity Total savings is $100 and total consumption is $1,000
- This is an infinite sequence
For our example, GDP changes by
- Note - Savers deposit their money into the financial institutions, and in turn, they grant loans to businesses for new investment. That is where the money came from!
- If people hide their money in their mattresses, then banks do not have money to lend out for new investment
- We can also calculate the multiplier in two ways.
- First way we know MPS (or MPC), then the multiplier is:
- Second, if we knew how GDP changed when investment changed, then we use algebra to rearrange the equation to get:
- Note - things other than investment can cause the multiplier effect. Government can decrease taxes or increase government spending to stimulate the economy, or consumers get extra money.
- Example - President Bush gave tax payers anywhere from $300 to $600
- Consumers will spend this money and help the economy expand
|
Economic advisors for the U.S. President estimate the multiplier effect to be approximately 2 |
|