States and Markets in Transition Lecture 8
|
|
Deregulation
|
- Deregulation – reduce state’s power
- Marx and Lenin – guided by a set of official beliefs
- "The party line"
- Communal ownership – gov. owned means of production—factories, land, property
- Marx – private property is a means by which one person can exploit another
- An owner of a factory exploiting a worker
- Communism – state exploits a worker
- Free markets requires that economic and political power are separated
- Ideology
- Marx and Lenin ideology loses appeal
- Free markets
- Mercantilism and economic nationalism
- Gov. loses its ability to set prices or plan the economy
- Requires
- Private ownership
- Free markets
- Flexible wages and prices
- Deregulation does not mean power is dispersed
- New sources of power emerge outside the state
- Power could become re-concentrated in the hands of a few elite
- Old communist party bosses became the new capitalist bosses
- Does not exist under socialism
- Individual profit
- Unemployment - everyone who was able to work was required to do so
- Competition between firms
- Bankruptcy
- Transition requires new constitutions, political parties, electoral rules, administrative and judicial structures
- Educate citizens on "the rules of the game."
- Problems of large state bureaucracies
- Decided production level, prices, and who consumes them
- Soviet planners – used production quotas
- Quality was a secondary issue
- Soviet industries produced low quality goods
- Markets – consumers may flock to producers for better quality goods
- Material balancing – output and inputs have to match in manufacturing
- Requires perfect information
- Led to shortages and surpluses
- Example – mines do not meet their quotas for iron
- Steel factories do not meet their quotas
- A steel shortage trickles through causing shortages in other industries
- Military industry gets its steel first
- Consumer products for steel are last
- Shortage of cars
- Innovation – Soviet Union had a high-level of education
- Difficult to change production technologies because of the quotas
- Imposes costs
- No incentives to design new products
- Product designs were rarely updated
- Methods to convert public assets into private ones
- Voucher privatization – gov. gives or sells people vouchers
- People have no money
- Vouchers become assets
- Buy shares in privatized companies
- Purchase apartments and real estate
- In some cases, gov. gave vouchers to families that had their property seized by gov. when country went socialistic
- Auctions – gov. sells firms to the highest bidder
- Generates revenue for gov.
- Usually people within country have no money
- Foreigners buy assets
- Attracts foreign investment
- Country is “being sold to foreigners”
- Convert public companies into corporations
- Joint ventures
- Gov. retains control by being a majority shareholder
- Allows foreigners to invest
- Attracts foreign technology
- Examples
- Hungary allowed foreigners to freely invest
- Capture a 1/3 of all investment to Eastern Europe and CIS
- Czechoslovakia and Poland had more restrictions
- Fairness issues – many, because who gets what
- Prices are signals
- Prices tell individual consumers and producers about the cost and benefits of different actions
- Prices reflect a product’s scarcity
- More scarcity a product is, the higher the market price
- Socialist countries – prices for goods were relatively low relative to their wages
- Bureaucracy sets prices
- Consumer goods and services were often limited and of poor quality
- Consumers found themselves with more money than they could spend.
- Black markets emerged for imported goods, hard currency, or products and services in short supply.
- Pay bribes
- Ex: Pay doctors for better health care
- Painful when gov. removed price controls
- Removing price controls leads to rapid price increases (rapid inflation)
- Shortages disappear, but goods are sold at high prices
- Hurts the poor, elderly, and pensioners
- Workers demand higher wages from their places of work
- Employers are still owned by the state
- Some governments printed money to cover budget deficits
- Causes inflation or even hyperinflation
- Hyperinflation devastates a economy
|
Russia's Transition to Capitalism
|
- Communist party – power is rooted in one party
- Written into the nation's constitution
- "Leader" is General Secretary of the Communist party
- Membership in the Communist party was limited to about 5 to 10 percent of the population
- Nomenklatura – controlled all machinery of government
- Lived better than rest of population
- Preferential treatment
- Better housing
- Travel abroad
- Special stores stocked with Western goods or products in short supply
- Russia jumped from an agrarian society directly to Soviet industrialization in 1917
- Little experience with democracy and free markets
- Growth of heavy industry, infrastructure, educational and health facilities, and urbanization.
- Soviet Union grew rapidly during 1960s
- Stagnation and resignation reigned during 1970s and 1980s
- In some countries even life expectancy began to decline
- Mikhail Gorbachev came to power in 1985
- Inherited a stagnant economy
- Gorbachev represented a new, younger generation of Soviet leaders
- Set of economic and political reforms
- Glasnost (openness) – greater personal freedom
- Perestroika (reconstruction) - reorganization of the economy
- Factory managers were given greater authority to make production decisions
- State planning bureaucracy was still in place and maintained its power
- Private ownership and private enterprise were encouraged, but prices remained regulated.
- System was doomed to collapse
- Political power and gov. are intertwined
- Difficult to separate the two
- Soviet Union dissolved in 1991
- Cut subsidies to firms and agriculture
- Eliminated fixed prices on most goods
- Sold millions of apartments
- Over 100,000 small firms
- Over 15,000 large ones
- Used voucher privatization – allowed workers and managers to buy shares in their firms
- Auctioned firms to the highest bidder
- Gov. needed revenues
- Discouraged foreign investment
- Private Russian banks bought the largest and most valuable firms
- Marx’s fear – Country is now owned by a few rich bankers
- Russian is not integrated into the world or European economy
- Relies on its own large internal market
- Abundance of natural resources
- Sells petroleum and minerals to international market
- Petroleum and mineral prices are volatile
- The petroleum price oscillates between $50 and $150 per barrel
- Causes large swings in government revenue
- Russia achieved high GDP growth rates before 2008
- Businesses may not be following all the rules and regulations
- The Russian gov. passed the flat tax of 13% in 2001
- Banks own industry
- Similar to a Japanese Keiretsu
- Bank can grant low-interest loans to businesses within its group
- Provide financial management
- In 2007, 16% of the population now live in poverty
- Problems
- Russia inherited the debt of the Soviet Union
- The Soviet industries were spread out among the different republics
- During the breakup of the Soviet Union, industries shutdown because their suppliers were located in other republics
- Enforcement of basic laws are weak
- Organized crime – quickly expanded throughout country
- "Offer protection" to businesses or monopolizing markets
- Between 1991 and 1996 more than 100 bankers were assassinated
- The collapse of the Russian ruble in 1998
- Fears that private property could be renationalized by the state
- PresidentsVladimir Putin and Dmitry Medvedev are moving towards a more authoritarian government
- Kills foreign investment
- 2008 Financial Crisis
- Investors had fear that Russian banks could collapse
- Russia experienced a large outflow of capital
|
China – Successful
|
- Chinese leader Mao Zedong (1893-1976)
- Used Stalinist model – state owns the means of production, creates collective farms, and uses central planning
- China was even less agriculturally developed than the Soviet Union
- Peasants were hostile to bureaucracies and centralization
- Tried communal farms in favor of traditional family units
- System failed
- Gov. gradually introduced market forces to stimulate the economy but retained party power
- The Chinese economy experienced rapid growth
- Real GDP was growing 9% per year before the 2008 Financial Crisis.
- After the financial crisis, China is still growing
- Strong economic growth is fueled by mercantilism
- China devalues its currency
- Exports expand
- manufactured products, such as computers, textiles, heavy machinery, and industrial equipment
- Imports contract
- The trade surplus allowed China to garner approximately $2.2trillion of foreign currencies and gold in 2009
- Allowed peasants to sell agricultural products in markets
- Ag. production increased dramatically
- Food producers were more efficient
- Consumers benefited from increased production
- Alleviate rural poverty
- Lowered barriers to international trade and finance
- Attracted foreign investment
- World Bank’s estimates - China attracts $80 billion per year in foreign investment
- Introduced new products and resources
- Access to new technology
- "to be rich is glorious" (Marx would disapprove)
- Gov. legalized private businesses
- Started with small-scale firms
- Mid-1980s, state allows large private firms with thousands of workers
- State tries to control private enterprise and markets
- "the bird in the cage"
- State-run companies comprise approx. 60%
- tend to be inefficient, outdated, and kept afloat by government financial support
- State goes through cycles of relaxation and control of private markets and enterprises
- Some predict China will become the new leader and hegemon in the 21st century.
- China has two problems that could slow down its growth and prevent it from becoming a world leader.
- China does not have enough resources to fuel this strong growth for the next generation.
- Eventually, China will have to import minerals and resources on a large scale.
- Japan and the Asian tigers also have this problem
- The China’s policy of one child per family will come back to haunt them.
- Eventually, China’s population will largely comprised of the elderly and retired people.
|