Price controls
- gov. mandated prices. Gov. thinks price is too high or too low.
1.
Price ceilings
- a legally established maximum price that sellers may charge.
Example 1 - Some rental markets, like New York City, set a maximum price that landlords can charge for apartment rent.
Rental Market |
Price, Rent |
|
Quantity, Tenants |
- The market price is P* and quantity is Q*. Gov. thinks rent is too expensive, and sets price at
P~
.
- Market rent price > Rent controlled price:
- Direct effect (When P* >
P~
).
- Quantity demanded (
Qd
) > quantity supplied (
Qs
).
- Shortage.
- Secondary effects of price ceilings.
- Long waiting lists.
- "Under the table" payments to landlord.
- Tenants has to buy expensive furniture from landlord.
- Investors do not invest in new housing, because market rents are too low to make a profit.
- The quality of housing will deteriorate.
- Landlords lower costs by less maintenance and repairs.
|
A very good trick question on the exam. If
P~
> P*, then the price control has no effect on the market. |
2.
Price Floor
- a legally established minimum price that buyers must pay.
Example 2 - Government requires employers to pay a minimum wage.
Labor Market (Unskilled workers) |
Price |
|
Quantity |
- Gov. thinks workers' wages are too low and set the wage rate to $5.30 per hour (
P~
).
- Employers demand workers, while employees supply labor.
- The wage is the price of labor.
- Direct effect (When
P~
> P*).
- Quantity supplied (
Qs
) > quantity demanded (
Qd
).
- Surplus of labor, i.e. "unemployment."
- Secondary effects
- Employer reduces
- Health insurance.
- Job training.
- Pension plans.
- Usually hurts unskilled labor, the poor, and teenagers.
|
If P* >
P~
, then the price control has no effect on the market Professional jobs tend to pay more than minimum wage. |
|
-
Tax incidence
- how the "economic" burden of tax is shared between buyers and sellers.
-
Statutory incidence of tax
- the legal assignment of who pays a tax
- Who sends the taxes to the gov.
- Tax incidence and statutory incidences differ.
- Example: Gov. places a $1 tax on each pizza sold on pizza producers.
- Statutory incidence falls on producers.
-
Tax rate
- the per-unit tax
- Taxes are usually a percentage; this changes the slope of supply function.
- Supply curve shifts left by exactly $1.
- Market price was at P*, $10 per pizza.
Pt
does not equal $11.
- Price lies between $11 and $10.
- The tax changes consumer's behavior.
- Higher market price (price + tax),
Pt
.
- Consumers buy less,
Qt
.
-
Tax base
- the total amount of goods, which are taxed.
- The higher the tax rates, the smaller the tax base.
- Changes consumers' and producers' behavior.
- Tax revenue from pizza =
Qt
X $1.
- (area of a rectangle width X height)
- blue area + yellow area.
-
"Yellow area" - actual tax burden on sellers.
-
"Blue area"- actual tax burden on buyers.
-
Deadweight loss of taxation
- the red area.
- "Excess burden of taxation."
- Nobody receives this revenue.
- A loss to society, because gov. interfered with the market.
Pizza Market |
Price |
|
Quantity |
- If the $1 pizza tax was placed on the buyer.
- (switching statutory incidence from sellers to buyers).
- The buyer send the tax to the gov.
- The demand curve will shift to the left by $1, but the end result is exactly the same!
- Statutory incidence of tax changed, but the tax burden remained the same.
Pizza Market |
Price |
|
Quantity |
- Do not worry about elasticities! Using elasticities of demand and supply, economists can predict which party has the larger tax burden.
-
Inelastic demand
(relative to supply) - quantity demanded is not sensitive to price changes.
- Tax burden falls on consumers.
- Gov. loves to tax inelastic goods.
- Gasoline (short-run).
- Beer / liquor.
- Cigarettes.
|
1.
Average tax rate
= tax liability / taxable income.
Ex: Salary is $20,000 and tax liability is $5,000.
average tax rate = $5,000 / $20,000 X 100% = 25%
-
Progressive tax rate
- average tax rate rises with income.
-
Proportional tax
- the average tax rate stays the same across all income levels.
- Kazakhstan - income tax is 20% of income
-
Regressive tax
- the average tax rate falls with income, i.e. higher income results in lower average tax rate.
Example 1 - U.S. Income taxes are progressive - low-income households pay small average tax rates, while high-income households pay higher tax rates.
Example 2 - Sales tax on food. 2 families each spend $10,000 on food per year. Sales tax is 7%, so $700 is collected from each family per year.
1st family's income = $50,000 F 1.4% 2nd family's income = $20,000 F 3.5%
F Sales tax tends to be a regressive tax.
2.
Marginal tax rate
= D tax liability / D taxable income.
Ex: If marginal tax rate = 28% and family income increases by $100, then tax liability increases by $28. The tax increase affects household decisions to work, save, leisure, etc.
3.
Laffer Curve
- shows relationship between tax rates and tax revenues.
- Two points:
- 0% tax rate = 0 tax revenue
- 100 % tax rate = 0 tax revenue
- Nobody would legally work; government takes all income
- As the tax rate increases, the tax base decreases (the activity being taxed),
- Tax changes behavior.
- Deadweight loss increases.
- Example: - Refer to Laffer Curve diagram below.
- The tax rate is 50% and the gov. wants to increase tax revenue.
- If the tax rate is increased, tax revenue declines further.
- If tax rate is lowered, then tax revenue increases!
- Nobody knows the shape of these curves!!!
- Basis of Reaganomics.
- President Ronald Reagan lowered tax rates during 1980s.
- During the 1980s, the top marginal income tax rate fell from 70% to 33% (the average tax rates for the "rich" decreased).
- Between 1980 and 1990 real income tax revenue collected from the top 1 % of earners rose a whopping 51.4 %.
Laffer Curve |
Tax Revenue |
|
Tax Rate |
|
-
Black markets – markets that operate outside of the legal system
-
Also called the shadow or hidden economy
-
Why?
-
Sell illegal products or services
-
Avoid high taxes
-
Under report income
-
Over report liabilities
-
Use barter – internet allows people to find each other
-
Money is not exchanged, thus value of transaction is zero for tax purposes
-
Circuvent price controls and costly regulations
-
Decline in civil loyalty to gov.
-
People lose respect for gov.
-
Why should people pay taxes, etc.
-
Black markets have supply/demand functions
-
Differences between legitimate and black markets
-
Black markets tend to:
-
Supply more defective products
-
Have higher profits
-
Have higher risk, such as arrest, fines/fees, and/or prisons/jails
-
Have greater violence in enforcing contracts
-
Problems
-
Lower tax revenue – gov. cannot invest in infrastructure, education, etc.
-
Gov. statistics are inaccurate
-
Example – Unemployment rate is higher than actual
-
Participants will lie and say they are not working
-
Size of black markets
-
Appear to be growing in many countries
-
Black markets thrive in highly taxed, highly regulated economies.
Size of Hidden Economy for Several Countries
Size of Hidden Economy 1990 – 1993 |
% of Real GDP |
Nigeria |
68 to 76% |
Mexico |
40 to 60% |
Russia |
20 to 27% |
Hong Kong |
13% |
United States |
8 to 10% |
Japan |
8 to 10% |
Source: Schneider and Enste (2000)
-
How to fix black markets
-
Remove price controls
-
Lower taxes
-
Reduce regulations
-
Foster competition
-
As size of black markets decrease, then corruption will decrease too
|